
Wells Fargo posts $2.55 billion loss in Q4
Hampered by its move to bolster credit loss reserves, Wells Fargo saw a $2.55 billion loss in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Over 2008, Wells Fargo built up its reserves against credit losses by $8.14 billion to $21.7 billion, which it estimates covers 12 months of predicted losses on consumer loans and 24 months of predicted losses on commercial and commercial real estate loans.
Its acquisition of Wachovia, which was completed on December 31, also damped results, swinging to a $11.17 billion loss in the quarter. Wells Fargo has taken measures to unwind the risk on Wachovia's balance sheet, by writing down $37.2 billion in high-risk loans on its loan portfolio.
On October 29, Wells Fargo received a $25 billion capital injection from the US Treasury in exchange for 25,000 shares of preferred stock via the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program. Wells Fargo also stated that it would not request a second capital injection. Other banks have not fared as well, with Bank of America asking for a second government bail-out after suffering from heavier-than-expected losses after its acquisition of Merrill Lynch.
Wells Fargo's move to unwind balance-sheet risk pushed its tier-one capital ratio lower in the quarter - it stood at 7.9% at the close of the year, down from its September 30 level of 8.58%.
Commenting on steps the bank has taken to reduce balance sheet risk, chief financial officer Howard Atkins stated in a conference call: "While these actions and other significant items resulted in reported losses at both banks in the fourth quarter, the balance sheet of the combined organization was strengthened and the resultant 'de-risked' capital position of the new organisation remains strong."
See also: JP Morgan Q4 net income plunges 74%
Citi hit by $8.9 billion Q4 loss, splits company
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Delving into the European Commission’s proposed overhaul of FRTB
Raft of potential changes would benefit both IMA and SA banks – but only temporarily
Why the survival of internal models is vital for financial stability
Risk quants say stampede to standardised approaches heightens herding and systemic risks
Crypto custody a bit(coin) closer after US accounting U-turn
Federal banking supervisors expected to eventually relax regimes for safeguarding digital assets
Japan’s regulator stands firm behind Basel as peers buckle
Japanese banks fear being at a disadvantage to rivals as Basel III implementation falters
EU racing to comply with active account rules
Industry wants simpler route to exemptions ahead of ‘challenging’ deadline for new clearing regime
CFTC acting chair: ‘We don’t need a Dodd-Frank for crypto’
US regulator wants real-time market surveillance; focuses on rise of liquidity risk
Large banks safer for CCPs than they get credit for
Plentiful pre-positioned liquidity softens the blow of resolution, new research argues
Basel uniformity fades as members defy dress code
Rule-makers diverge from Basel III standards, denting aims of comparability and fuelling fears over fair competition