Wells Fargo posts $2.55 billion loss in Q4
Hampered by its move to bolster credit loss reserves, Wells Fargo saw a $2.55 billion loss in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Over 2008, Wells Fargo built up its reserves against credit losses by $8.14 billion to $21.7 billion, which it estimates covers 12 months of predicted losses on consumer loans and 24 months of predicted losses on commercial and commercial real estate loans.
Its acquisition of Wachovia, which was completed on December 31, also damped results, swinging to a $11.17 billion loss in the quarter. Wells Fargo has taken measures to unwind the risk on Wachovia's balance sheet, by writing down $37.2 billion in high-risk loans on its loan portfolio.
On October 29, Wells Fargo received a $25 billion capital injection from the US Treasury in exchange for 25,000 shares of preferred stock via the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program. Wells Fargo also stated that it would not request a second capital injection. Other banks have not fared as well, with Bank of America asking for a second government bail-out after suffering from heavier-than-expected losses after its acquisition of Merrill Lynch.
Wells Fargo's move to unwind balance-sheet risk pushed its tier-one capital ratio lower in the quarter - it stood at 7.9% at the close of the year, down from its September 30 level of 8.58%.
Commenting on steps the bank has taken to reduce balance sheet risk, chief financial officer Howard Atkins stated in a conference call: "While these actions and other significant items resulted in reported losses at both banks in the fourth quarter, the balance sheet of the combined organization was strengthened and the resultant 'de-risked' capital position of the new organisation remains strong."
See also: JP Morgan Q4 net income plunges 74%
Citi hit by $8.9 billion Q4 loss, splits company
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say