Senators move to establish stronger federal oversight of energy markets
A group of US senators yesterday introduced legislation, called the Energy Market Oversight Act, that seeks to restore the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) authority over online and bilateral energy trades and give the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Ferc) powers to investigate and punish possible instances of fraud and manipulation in the over-the-counter energy markets.
The act is, in effect, a resurrection of last year’s Feinstein-led proposals to impose tighter control of the OTC markets in the wake of Enron’s collpase and the California power crisis. Her proposals were defeated in a routine procedural vote in April 2002 that required 60 affirmative senate votes for her legislation to advance.
“The legislation would close a loophole that allows energy trades to take place online with no transparency, no record keeping and no audit trail – with no federal oversight to guard against fraud and manipulation,” Feinstein said.
In 2000, Congress passed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which essentially exempted online and bilateral energy and metals trading from regulatory oversight. This loophole, the senators argue, allowed energy companies – such as EnronOnline – to trade billions of dollars worth of energy derivatives with no regulatory oversight. Their proposed legislation would increase notice, reporting, bookkeeping and other transparency requirements, and require energy companies to maintain sufficient capital to cover trades commensurate with risks.
The bill also seeks to prohibit 'wash trades', a practice that gained notoriety last year as a number of firms were found to be trading the same asset at the same price to boost trading volume figures. If the legislation passes, wash trades would be subject to civil penalties for each violation, and those found guilty could be imprisoned for up to 10 years. In December 2002, a former El Paso natural gas trader was indicted for reporting fictitious natural gas transactions to an industry publication, and Dynegy, Duke, El Paso, Reliant, CMS, and Williams have all admitted to engaging in wash trades.
The legislation also seeks to authorise Ferc to fine companies that do not comply with requests for information. This is the same authority that the Securities Exchange Commission has over financial institutions.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Trump 2.0 bank supervision: simpler but no soft touch?
Republican FDIC vice-chair Travis Hill wants more focus on financial risk instead of process
Iosco mimics industry codes to tackle pre-hedging dilemma
Advocates breathe sigh of relief, but Iosco release carries suggested restrictions
Ice’s AFX swoop shines spotlight on Ameribor prospects
CEO John Shay steps down after exchange group buys firm for mortgage and index synergies
Barr’s Fed exit likely to delay, but not destroy, Basel III
Market risk, op risk and leverage ratio all in the sights of Barr’s potential successors
FCMs call for more oversight of self-clearing CCP members
Clearing firms worry that PTFs and market-makers joining CCPs en masse will increase systemic risk
Complex EU active account reporting could drive trades out of UK
Draft Emir rules might not force large volumes to move to EU, but will make compliance difficult
Capital neutrality key to completing Basel III, says Quarles
Former Republican Fed vice-chair thinks Hill or Bowman could help revive stalled prudential rules
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices