Copper scandal prompts SRB to ban trading

China is to ban units within its State Reserves Bureau (SRB) from trading in equity, foreign exchange, corporate bonds and derivatives, according to newswire reports in Beijing.

The state-owned agency, which manages reserves of copper, oil and grains, admitted that it had taken the decision “to avoid more huge losses on investments” after state metals trader Liu Qibing reputedly lost $300 million last October in wrong-way short positions on an estimated 200,000 tons.

Liu officially worked for the separate State Regulation Centre for Supplies Reserve, but it later became apparent that he was in fact trading on behalf of the SRB. He has not been seen since the scandal broke, and the SRB says it is unsure of Liu’s whereabouts.

A deadline to settle the position passed on December 21, and metals analysts believe the bureau was allowed to roll forward most of the deliveries over the next three years. It had been hoping that prices would fall, but prices have soared after traders became dubious of SRB announcements that it had huge stockpiles to release into the markets.

Robin Bhat, a metals analyst at UBS in London, said the decision to put off payment could further backfire for the Chinese. “They have rolled forward presumably in the belief that the price would fall,” he said. “But it’s another bet that they’ve made and it could deal them a serious blow. We seem to be delaying the day of reckoning.”

The price of copper has continued to climb since then, and reached a record high of $4,615 per ton earlier this month on the London Metals Exchange – some $700 above trading when the scandal broke, adding to the cost of settling the position.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here