NAB to lose up to A$180 million on unauthorised FX options trades
National Australia Bank (NAB) is set to lose up to A$180 million ($140 million) from unauthorised foreign exchange option trades, despite efforts to improve its operational risk management in the past couple of years.
The losses resulted from trades on the Australian dollar and New Zealand dollar options markets. It wasn’t clear whether the options involved Australian dollar/New Zealand dollar cross-currency pairs or the cross-currency rates between the two currencies and other currencies.
The dealers sought to cover the initial losses with unauthorised trades on NAB’s account, said one source familiar with the NAB investigation. "It appears that there was a large number of small trades," the source said.
"NAB internal controls caught the unauthorised trading quickly but didn’t prevent it," said a Singapore-based analyst. He added that the underlying issue was related to operational risk within a large organisation that has grown rapidly through mergers and acquisitions in recent years.
Four members of the bank’s currency options trading team were involved in unauthorised options trades from October to mid-January, said NAB spokesman Robert Hadler. NAB’s board subsequently suspended the four employees and closed all outstanding trades to stop further losses.
Hadler said the next step is to complete an internal review and work with policing authorities to decide on further action.
NAB has also reviewed its risk management procedures, although no changes are planned. One on-going change that may help is NAB’s current introduction of an electronic forex options system to replace the existing manual system, Hadler said.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising