Tied up in knots

Do rules or risk management fight money laundering best? US regulators think the latter, but their approach has left banks feeling not so sure. Nick Kochan reports

Question: When is a risk not a risk?
Answer: When it’s a rule.

This joke, which is currently doing the rounds among anti-money laundering (AML) officers at US financial institutions, sums up the frustration many bankers feel with a vagueness at the heart of the US system of banking regulation, and particularly in the anti-money laundering area of banking supervision. The AML area was meant to be one of the first to shift from being rules based to being risk based, to keep it in line with the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here