FinCEN clarifies AML rules for insurance firms
WASHINGTON, DC – The recent federal rules that mandate anti-money laundering (AML) programmes in insurance companies do not require the companies to implement customer identification programmes, according to new guidance from the Financial Crimes Network (FinCEN).
However, the agency says in its FAQs guidance that insurance companies that are subsidiaries of banking organisations should consult with their parent bank's primary Federal regulator regarding their obligation to obtain and retain customer-related information necessary to administer an effective anti-money laundering programme.
The rule requiring insurance companies to report suspicious activity has been in effect since May 2.
FinCEN also clarified the obligations of futures commission merchants subject to the final due diligence rules implementing section 312 of the USA Patriot Act (the "section 312 rules").
Broker agreements
Introducing brokers, who solicit orders from the public for the purchase or sale of commodity futures contracts, may not accept money, securities, or other property for the purpose of margining, guaranteeing, or securing solicited or accepted trades or contracts.
"The introducing broker will only enter into an agreement with a futures commission merchant, under which the introducing broker will introduce customers to the futures commission merchant.
"The introduced customer will establish an account directly with the futures commission merchant, in which the futures commission merchant will clear and carry the introduced customer's commodity futures trades until they are offset or settled," according to the guidance.
But for the purposes of correspondent accounts, the futures commission merchant will execute an account agreement directly with an introduced foreign financial institution so that it can accept money, securities, or other property to margin, guarantee, or secure trades or contracts cleared and carried for the foreign financial institution.
The execution of the account agreement by a futures commission merchant establishes a "formal relationship" with the introduced foreign financial institution, subjecting the futures commission merchant to compliance with the due diligence provisions of the correspondent account rule. OR&C
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement
The wisdom of Oz? Why Australia is phasing out AT1s
Analysts think Australian banks will transition smoothly, but other countries unlikely to follow
EU trade repository matching disrupted by Emir overhaul
Some say problem affecting derivatives reporting has been resolved, but others find it persists
Barclays and HSBC opt for FRTB internal models
However, UK pair unlikely to chase approval in time for Basel III go-live in January 2026
Foreign banks want level playing field in US Basel III redraft
IHCs say capital charges for op risk and inter-affiliate trades out of line with US-based peers
CFTC’s Mersinger wants new rules for vertical silos
Republican commissioner shares Democrats’ concerns about combined FCMs and clearing houses
Adapting FRTB strategies across Apac markets
As Apac banks face FRTB deadlines, MSCI explores the insights from early adopters that can help them align with requirements