Basel II language issues disadvantage insurance industry

LONDON - A new paper from the Centre for the Study of Financial Innovation (CSFI), A tough nut... Basel II, insurance and the law of unexpected consequences , written by Shirley Beglinger, seeks to explain why insurers have so far had little joy from the Basel Accord, which was designed to provide a new role for insurance as a mitigator of operational risk.

Insurers have not been able to gain any significant opportunity from the implementation of Basel II because it was "written by bankers, primarily for bankers", and demands placed upon insurers were expressed in a way that made it difficult for the insurance industry to meet them. Although Basel II was carefully drafted to eliminate opportunities for abuse by creative bankers, its detail is so couched in banking terms that the linguistic differences will make compliance an exasperating problem

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Register

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here