Reduce regulatory overlap, say US firms

WASHINGTON, DC – The regulatory guidance on compliance with several operational risk requirements is inefficient, and needs to be streamlined to reduce operational and financial burdens suffered by US financial institutions, according to the Financial Services Roundtable (FSR), a consortium of America’s 100 largest financial institutions.

In a report, Reconciliation of Regulatory Overlap for the Management and Supervision of Operational Risk in U.S. Financial Institutions, conducted by the FSR’s Operational Risk Working Group and KPMG, the FSR says redundancy exists among the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA), the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA), the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) and the US proposed Inter-Agency Operational Risk Supervisory Guidance on the Advanced Measurement

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here