CEIOPS looks at Solvency II developments
The Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (CEIOPS) held its Members’ Meeting, where it addressed the development of Solvency II and approved its final “Answers to the European Commission’s third wave of Calls for Advice in the Framework of the Solvency II project”.
The advice covers features of the future prudential regime for insurance and reinsurance undertakings, including eligible elements to cover the capital requirements, co-operation between supervisory authorities, supervisory reporting and public disclosure, pro-cyclicality and small undertakings.
CEIOPS also approved its final ‘Recommendation on Independence and Accountability’. The advice is being submitted to the European Commission on CEIOPS’ own initiative together with its response to the third wave of calls for advice and concerns the independence and accountability of supervisory authorities generally and the supervisory review process specifically.
CEIOPS further approved its advice on the ‘Prudential treatment of ‘deeply subordinated debt’. The advice follows a request from the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Committee (EIOPC) for CEIOPS to consider a proposal on possible changes to its advice under the current insurance directives.
CEIOPS then approved its final specification for the second round of its ‘Quantitative Impact Study’ in the context of the Solvency II project. The draft specification had been the subject of earlier comments by CEIOPS members and of a recent ‘pre-test’, the results of which led to their finalisation. The specification, together with the related documentation, will be published at the due time for the commencement of the exercise. Issues discussed by CEIOPS in addition to Solvency II included agreement of its ‘Protocol Relating to the Cooperation of the Competent Authorities of the Member States of the European Union in Particular Concerning the Application of Directive 2002/92/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 December 2002 on Insurance Mediation’ (the Luxembourg Protocol). The Protocol provides for supervisory co-operation between competent authorities under the Insurance Mediation Directive.
Updated reports will be on the CEIOPS website shortly.
BaselAlert.comOnly users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness