New double-counting methodology responsible for greater-than-expected rise in credit derivatives
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association’s mid-year survey of the over-the-counter derivatives market showed a substantial increase in credit derivatives notional volumes, growing from $918.9 billion at the end of 2001 to $1.6 trillion at mid-2002. But the figure this year was calculated according to a new adjustment rate to discount double counting, which eliminates trades between two counterparties being counted twice. This has put an excessively favourable sheen on the latest results, said Isda.
“Looking at the BIS survey, we drew the conclusion that the number of end-users were greater than the amount of dealers in the credit derivatives world. So, based on the BIS methodology, we raised our adjustment factor by 18%,” said Mengle. “Had we used the same adjustment factor for the previous survey, total credit derivative volumes would have been over $1 trillion at the end of last year,” he added.
According to Isda’s new methodology, credit derivatives volumes increased by 44% in the first six months of the year on a pro forma basis.
Interest rate and currency derivatives volumes also showed reasonable growth in the first half of the year, increasing by 19% to $82.7 trillion. Isda also surveyed the equity derivatives market for the first time. Total notional outstandings for equity derivatives stood at $2.3 trillion at mid-2002.
Isda’s mid-year derivatives survey is based on responses collated from around 80 of its member firms, including major derivatives houses, government entities and end-users.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact