Nationalisation remedy prescribed for B&B and Fortis
After another dramatic September weekend, British lender Bradford & Bingley (B&B) became the second UK bank this year to be nationalised, while pan-European financial services group Fortis received a massive capital injection from the governments of Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg.
The remainder of B&B’s assets and liabilities – including its mortgage book, personal loans business, headquarters, treasury assets and wholesale liabilities – will be brought under public ownership. The decision follows a similar course of action taken by the UK government in February to nationalise Northern Rock.
Alistair Darling, the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, said the move would protect B&B’s retail customers. “Following recent turbulence in global financial markets, B&B has found itself under increasing pressure as investors lost confidence in its ability to carry on as an independent institution,” Darling said. “The FSA determined on Saturday morning that the firm no longer met its threshold conditions for operating as a deposit taker under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and FSA rules.”
The transfer of retail assets to Santander will be backed by £18 billion of cash from the Treasury and the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. This will be initially funded through a short-term loan from the Bank of England, which will subsequently be replaced by a longer term government loan.
To give assurance to wholesale market institutions that have exposures to B&B, the government has put in place guarantee arrangements for six months to safeguard certain borrowings and deposits. The government is seeking state aid approval from the European Commission to extend these arrangements during the restructuring of B&B’s business.
The senior management of B&B – headed by chief executive Richard Pym – will remain in place during the initial period of public ownership.
Meanwhile, Fortis, which is listed in Brussels, Amsterdam and Luxembourg, on Sunday received an €11.2 capital injection for shares by the governments of Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg. The move came after talks to sell all or parts of its business to BNP Paribas and ING broke down.
The Belgian government is paying €4.7 billion for a 49% stake in Fortis’ Belgian banking unit; while the Netherlands and Luxembourg governments will pay €4 billion and €2.5 billion for similarly-sized holdings in the firm’s banking businesses in those countries.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs