Aquila cuts staff to stave-off rating downgrade
Aquila, the Missouri-based energy trader, has cut 200 jobs across its merchant services energy risk management division. A total of 150 of the cuts are in its Kansas City head office, 43 are across its other North American offices and seven will affect Aquila’s European operations.
“Every market is still well covered, and when you consider that we employ 1,172 people in this division across the US, the cuts are negligible,” said the spokeswoman. “The whole energy industry is being challenged post-Enron, but I want to make it clear that the cuts were in no way related to the Federal Energy Regulatory Committee (Ferc) investigations.”
"We have completed a review of our trading practices for any evidence of the use of trading strategies identified by the Ferc and outlined in the Enron memos under review," Ed Mills, Aquila merchant service's president and chief operating officer said a statement released earlier this week.
"Our review indicates our trading activities during this time period were proper and in full compliance with the regulations and standards issued by the Ferc. We have found no evidence that Aquila conducted any of the identified Enron trading strategies.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision