US and European firms in bid for LCH
A consortium of major US and European financial institutions is lining up a bid for London-based derivatives clearing house LCH.Clearnet. Deutsche Bank is acting as adviser on the acquisition, as well as being part of the bidding group.
An official representing the transatlantic consortium told Risk the group also includes BNP Paribas, Société Générale, UBS, JP Morgan, HSBC and Royal Bank of Scotland, along with interdealer broker Icap, which confirmed its involvement on February 2.
He added a small number of other major banks are also involved, with more firms interested in participating, but declined to give names.
Increased market turbulence and counterparty risk concerns have pushed clearing services into the spotlight since the early part of last year. In particular, regulators in Europe and the US view central clearing for credit derivatives as critically important for financial stability.
LCH.Clearnet has 109 clearing members and is 73.3% user owned, but the group wants the clearing house to be owned and run by a smaller number of active players.
Additionally, the consortium wants to break up a non-binding merger agreement for LCH.Clearnet signed on October 22, 2008 with US clearing giant, the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC). Concerns have been raised that a merger of the US and UK firms would stifle competition in the clearing space.
To date, no formal bid or timeframe has been set by the consortium. However, any proposition would need to be greater than the price agreed with the DTCC, which gave LCH.Clearnet an implied equity value of €739 million, or up to €10 a share. That deal is due to be completed on March 15, unless a counter offer is made.
See also: The fight is on for LCH
DTCC and LCH.Clearnet plan €739 million merger
Breath of Liffe
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Banks urge EBA to delay risk benchmarking amid Iran conflict
Risk managers say hypothetical portfolio exercise clashes with severe market turbulence
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit