US banks call for more leeway on mark-to-market rules
The American Bankers Association, a lobbying group, has protested that its members need more relaxed valuation rules, blaming the Financial Accounting Standards Board for ignoring the financial crisis.
The ABA's president, Edward Yingling, complained in a letter to SEC chairman Christopher Cox that FASB "apparently still refuses to recognise the realities of the current situation".
FASB said on October 10 that banks could use other methods of valuing illiquid securities rather than relying on mark-to-market accounting - which would lead to undervaluation of troubled products.
But, Yingling said, FASB had undermined this by insisting that valuations should also include a liquidity risk premium: "This requirement brings the guidance full circle back to distressed sale values," he wrote, and called for the SEC, which has the final say over US accounting standards, to overrule FASB.
On September 30, the SEC reminded banks that existing accounting rules did not mandate the use of mark-to-market accounting in all circumstances, but it did not provide specific guidance or examples of when the principle could be abandoned.
See also: SEC to ease mark-to-market rules
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Endgame manoeuvre: US banks put SLR reform back in spotlight
Plan to ease Basel III brings renewed focus to impact of leverage ratio on US Treasury market
More disclosure touted to temper pre-hedging ills
Transparency could help investors choose a dealer, but will they use the disclosures?
Regulators want to fix AT1s. Investors want restraint
Tweaking the instrument that regulators love to hate may be the only way to prevent its abolition
Fed’s Basel III rollback gives clearing units a capital break
Client-cleared trades will be exempt from CVA charges and G-Sib surcharge calculations, says Barr
DTCC ‘will prevail’ in UST clearing, says CME’s Duffy
CME boss says LCH-FMX cross-margining deal could face obstacles, and acknowledges difficulties at BrokerTec
The standoff over separate account margining
CFTC issues sixth extension of no-action relief as long-awaited final rule stalls
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
EU banks lose relief on model test after FRTB delay
Deferment of new trading book regime to January 2025 eats into transition period for “erratic” P&L attribution test