BrokerTec confirms takeover talks
Bond trading platform BrokerTec has confirmed widespread industry rumours that it is the subject of takeover talks. BrokerTec issued a statement on Friday stating it received approaches from several parties about "possible strategic combinations”, and was in the early stages of talks with an unspecified number of potential partners.
BrokerTec would not name the other parties involved in the takeover talks, but London-based inter-dealer broker Icap is widely rumoured to be the prime contender to buy Jersey City-based BrokerTec.
Icap declined to confirm or deny the reports.
An analyst close to one of the firms said the deal would make sense for Icap, as the fixed-income markets are becoming more open to electronic trading. "It would be cheaper than building its own system and then having to build up liquidity," the analyst added.
Icap is cash-rich, having last year raised more than £32 million from the sale of its shareholdings in the London Stock Exchange, Liffe and Deutsche Borse, and has more than £155 million in total cash reserves - enough, the analyst believes, to buy BrokerTec outright.
It is unclear what changes Icap would make if it were to take over the bond broker. Icap operates a proprietary trading system, the ETC (Electronic Trading Community) platform for securities, developed by Icap predecessor Garban.
BrokerTec uses a system based on OM’s Click technology, which it may be unwilling to relinquish. Jones added that BrokerTec is always looking to improve its platform, but has no plans to replace it.
It is also unclear what would happen to the 14 US and European banks that are BrokerTec shareholders. But big-name bank shareholders are unlikely to deter Icap. In December last year it merged the joint venture it has with Tradition Financial Services, TFS-Icap, with online FX options broking platform Volbroker, after which Volbroker’s bank shareholders ceded control to TFS-Icap.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules