![Risk.net](https://www.risk.net/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
EU capital rules remain on tight deadline
European Union (EU) plans for implementing the complex Basel II bank safety rules remain on a very tight schedule, and yesterday's issue of a EU progress report is a positive step, officials at European banking organisations said.
The commission said that the working document would provide the basis for a “structured dialogue” co-ordinated by the commission at the European level, and by EU member state regulatory agencies at the national level, which will continue until the end of January.
The publication of the EU paper allows debate on the proposals to begin in Europe and will help the commission, the EU’s executive body, keep to its target of bringing the new rules into force at the same time as Basel II in late 2006, a spokesman for the British Bankers’ Association (BBA) said.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the architect of Basel II and the body that in effect regulates international banking, wants to apply Basel II in the first instance to the large international banks of the world’s leading economies. The commission wants to apply the rules to all banks and investment firms in the EU, which by 2006 could comprise 25 nations compared with 15 at present.
Banks using advanced methods of measuring their risks under Basel II should enjoy lower protective capital charges than banks using the simpler approaches currently applied under the Basel I accord now in force in EU countries. A delay in implementing Cad 3 could mean that European banks will have to bear the burden of higher charges compared with their rivals until the new rules come into force in the EU, banking analysts said.
The commission yesterday said its timetable will be tight, but should allow for new laws to be agreed and national implementation agreed by the end of 2006.
A spokesman for the European Banking Federation (EBF) in Brussels said that whether the target is achievable is in the hands of EU member states and the European parliament. The spokesman stressed that it is important for the competitiveness of the European banks that the 2006 deadline is met.
The commission said it hopes to publish a third consultation document on its capital adequacy proposals in late spring or early summer next year, shortly after the Basel Committee issues its own third consultative paper on Basel II.
The Commission plans to adopt a Cad 3 proposal in the first part of 2004 after the Basel Committee issues its final version of Basel II by the end of 2003.
Banking industry analysts said obstacles to a smooth ride for Cad 3 are the European parliamentary elections in 2004 and the planned enlargement of the EU in the same year. Another source of possible problems is the different speeds at which member states can implement Cad 3. Some countries have already empowered their financial regulators to put the rules into effect, while others will need local parliamentary approval after EU parliamentary approval.
The commission is preparing a so-called “consequences report” on the impact of Cad 3 for all sectors of the EU economy, in particular the small to medium-sized business area. This report will be completed in advance of a legislative proposal by the commission.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
The boy who cried ‘outlier’: false alarms could dog EBA test
Analysis reveals banks deemed outliers by net income test are profitable post-shock, so how useful is the test?
Modernising compliance functions with regtech
Regtech addresses the complexities of regulatory requirements, offering innovative tools to modernise compliance functions, streamline processes and enhance efficiency. This article explores its role in compliance and reporting within the banking sector,…
For the Fed discount window, destigmatisation starts at home
US supervisors must change tack to encourage central bank liquidity utilisation
Study finds just 10 banks plan to apply for FRTB models
Research provides extra insight on reasons for decline in internal models
EU banks hedge net interest income to pass new IRRBB test
Would-be outliers look to cut sensitivity of cashflows to rate moves, but at what cost?
Banks cry foul over shock decision from Basel Committee
Asset and liability management professionals question severity of criteria in revised IRRBB tests
Fresh EU push for single securities supervisor to compete with US
But MEP expresses ‘concern’ EU nations will stall revival of capital markets union
Discord deepens over fund-linked trades in FRTB
More banks use punitive approach to capital treatment under new trading book regime, irking regulators