SG's Kerviel report blames supervisors and accomplice
Inattention by inexperienced supervisors and an accomplice in the bank's middle office helped Jerome Kerviel carry out rogue trades that lost Société Générale €4.9 billion in January this year, according to reports released by the bank today.
SG said that its internal investigation had discovered "indications of internal collusion" - a middle-office employee had apparently helped Kerviel conceal his unauthorised trades by entering fictitious offsetting trades and keeping track of the profits he had made. However, there were no signs of collusion with Kerviel's broker at the bank's Fimat subsidiary, contrary to earlier reports.
The resignation of Kerviel's manager in January 2007 left him unsupervised for almost three months - and his replacement was inexperienced and unable to exert proper oversight, the report added.
Another report, also released today by the bank's auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers, listed improvements to internal controls, including better reporting systems, reorganised oversight and biometric controls on trading systems.
The criminal investigation of Kerviel's activities is still underway.
See also: SG moves on
Police question second SG employee
Genius or blunder?
Kerviel acted alone, SG report finds
Back-office savvy aided SG fraud
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness