Former JP Morgan Chase fund trio make £55m
Three foreign exchange and fixed-income specialists who left JP Morgan Chase to set up a hedge fund have made profits of more than £55 million ($100 million) in their first year, according to RiskNews ' sister publication, FX Week .
They are the most profitable example of a common trend of the past two years: traders leaving banking jobs to set up currency and fixed-income hedge funds.
Reports of such stellar returns make it harder for banks to keep hold of their proprietary traders, who are increasingly leaving banks’ trading desks for the lucrative world of hedge fund management.
LDFM started with $1 billion under management, much of which came from JP Morgan Chase, where the directors managed the fund in-house before it was spun-off in 2002.
About 85% of hedge funds start out in this manner, estimated one trading manager at a bank in London. But the growing popularity of currency hedge funds means it is becoming more of a problem for banks’ prop foreign exchange desks.
Putting capital into a hedge fund set up by departing staff is one way that banks are dealing with this problem: by doing so, they are effectively outsourcing their prop desk -- and risk - to an external group. But banks may also have to start considering a return to the traditional pay structure for prop traders - a 10% share of their takings - rather than paying guaranteed bonuses to combat the lure of the buy side, said one ex-trader in London.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules