FSA releases details of landmark market manipulation legal judgement
The UK's Financial Services Authority (FSA) has released details of a legal judgement that repudiates a novel human rights defence attempted by an ex-JP Morgan equity derivatives trader accused of market manipulation.
Fleurose had been found guilty by an independent SFA tribunal in mid-1999 - and then by an independent SFA disciplinary appeal tribunal in early 2000 - of being a willing participant in transactions intended to depress the FTSE 100 index.
In January 1997, JP Morgan Securities in London had entered into a five-year FTSE 100/S&P 500 binary option. Morgan agreed to pay the counterparty 1.15% of the option’s notional value for each month where both indexes closed higher than the closing levels on the last trading day of the previous month.
On November 28 1997, Fleurose – then a senior trader at JP Morgan – entered into a series of trades, culminating in the sale of large volumes of top-five FTSE 100 stocks well below market prices in the final six seconds of electronic trading. As a consequence, the FTSE 100 closed at 4831.769 - below the option’s strike of 4842.3 - and JP Morgan was able to avoid a payout of £475,549.
Fleurose had claimed that the SFA’s enforcement was effectively a criminal, rather than civil, prosecution and that the vagueness of the charge against him meant that the fairness of his trial was compromised. These claims were rejected by the UK High Court in April 2001, and then by the UK Court of Appeal in December 2001.
The disciplinary proceedings resulted in Fleurose’s suspension from the SFA’s register of general representatives between November 30 1997 and December 1 1999, and he was ordered to pay £175,000 towards the regulator’s costs. Additionally, Henri Laurent – who was head of the equity derivatives group in London at JP Morgan in November 1997 and had instructed Fleurose to execute the trades - was expelled from the register and ordered to pay £200,000 towards the SFA’s costs.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Citizens’ growth won’t bow to regulatory thresholds, CRO says
Risk Live: Bank faces stricter capital and liquidity requirements if it crosses $250 billion in assets
FSB promotes convergence on operational incident reporting
As global body proposes common reporting format, official says there may be an optimum time window
SEC’s Peirce calls for US Treasury clearing delay
Risk Live: Current timeline impractical, commissioner warns; proposes task force to steer implementation
BNP Paribas exec fears data drought from market’s IMA cuts
Vendors may not step up with critical inputs to support internal models under FRTB
Hong Kong rationalises swaps reporting requirements
Some duplicate fields removed, but framework still more granular than other jurisdictions
The curious case of the revealing orders
Oxford academics have found evidence pointing to collusion on a European exchange, but market-makers aren’t wholly convinced
FDIC’s McKernan wants single capital stack in Basel III endgame
Rebuffing Barr’s offer of a partial rollback, Republican director also targets op risk framework
European banks search for consensus on credit spread risk
New EBA guidelines spawn diverging interpretations of which products must be assessed for CSRBB