Basel Committee releases new op risk sound practices paper
The risk management group of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision today released a final paper outlining a framework for the effective management and supervision of operational risk.
The paper generally advocates strong oversight by the bank’s board of directors and senior management, a strong operational risk culture throughout the organisation, effective internal reporting and contingency planning. After the publication of the July 2002 paper, many national groups, including the UK Financial Services Authority’s operational risk implementation advisory group (ORIAG), provided input for the Basel Committee’s revisions.
The February paper seems to be a fine-tuning of the July 2002 draft, more than a radical overhaul. Changes, for the most part, come down to the addition of a word or the reorganising of a sentence. One member of the Basel Committee that redrafted the document described it as “a matter of refinement”.
“The real question is how will this paper fit in with this issue of international convergence of supervisory policing of the operational framework,” said Richard Metcalfe, a director at the International Swaps and Derivatives Association in London and a member of the ORIAG group. “Can we build on that to have some true international co-ordination? It is a vital point.”
The Committee member added: “The hope is that this is something that can be used and adopted by banking supervisors in all jurisdictions. Whether we will achieve this or not, one never knows. But we feel that we have a good document here.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Capital neutrality key to completing Basel III, says Quarles
Former Republican Fed vice-chair thinks Hill or Bowman could help revive stalled prudential rules
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk