Germany’s DZ Bank takes €100 million-plus swaps hit
DZ Bank, the largest central co-operative bank in Germany, has made significant trading losses from its zero-coupon interest rate swaps positions.
The bank will book trading losses of €40 million due to its interest rate swaps positions for 2002, and will write down exceptional losses expected at more than €100 million in last year’s account, also associated with the swaps.
The losses are related to zero-coupon swaps entered into by DG Bank in 1997, before the bank merged with GZ Bank in 2001. When DG Bank upgraded its trading and risk systems in 1999 to a service provided by Summit Systems, a unit of UK systems provider Mysis, swaps data was incorrectly keyed into Summit. This created a mismatch between the bank’s active and passive swaps positions.
In effect, DZ Bank has posted artificially inflated profits for the past four years with regard to its trading book. Once one of these zero-coupon swaps reached maturity a few weeks ago, DZ Bank’s internal controls identified the error. Zero-coupon swaps are off-market swaps, where either or both the counterparties makes only one payment at maturity. This means they can effectively lie dormant in the trading book until maturity triggers payment.
A DZ Bank spokesman said an internal investigation was ongoing at the bank, but to date there was no indication of malicious behaviour or any problems associated with Summit technology.
DZ Bank acts as a ‘central bank’ to around 1,350 co-operative banks in Germany that typically cater to about 15% of the retail and small to medium-sized enterprise segment of the market.
Stefan Best, a bank analyst at credit rating agency Standard & Poor’s (S&P) in Frankfurt, said the losses were unlikely to affect DZ Bank’s A-/A2 rating with outlook negative. S&P takes the robustness of the entire co-operative banking system into consideration when assessing DZ Bank’s credit rating.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say