IMF estimates crisis losses at $1.4 trillion
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) on October 7 increased its estimate of losses on US-originated housing loans and associated securitisation products to $1.4 trillion from $945 billion.
The IMF said the turning point in the US housing market default cycle had not yet been reached, causing it to revise its loss forecast. Furthermore, the report noted the situation had worsened due to an increasingly disorderly deleveraging process at financial institutions, tightening of monetary and financial conditions, reduced risk appetite and increasing credit, market, liquidity and emerging market risks.
Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the managing director of the IMF, urged national authorities to take collective action to solve the global credit crisis. “The time for piecemeal solutions is over. I therefore call on policymakers to urgently address the crisis at a national level with comprehensive measures to restore confidence in the financial sector,” said Strauss-Kahn. “At the same time, national governments must closely coordinate these efforts to bring about a return to stability in the international financial system.”
Despite extensive efforts by banks to shore up capital bases in the past year, the IMF estimates $675 billion will be needed by major global institutions over the next several years. “Most market participants, rating agencies and regulators agree that capital buffers will need to be higher than previously thought,” the report claimed.
The IMF suggested any regulatory requirement for banks to have higher capital ratios should be phased in so that it does not exacerbate the current downturn. Nevertheless, the report added that “if protection against the full magnitude of the downward cycle is desired, the simulations suggest that building up a capital cushion of some 30-40% above normal levels in good times would be required to absorb the most severe shocks.”
Government authorities should provide further financial assistance to institutions, the fund said, advocating the use of public sector balance sheets to prevent firesale liquidations that threaten to reduce bank capital. One possible means of doing this would be the establishment of government asset management companies (AMCs) to purchase or provide long-term funding for ‘problem assets.’
This recalls the approach several Asian countries - including China, Japan and Korea – took during the Asian financial crisis, when AMCs were set up to acquire (and resolve) huge portfolios of non-performing loans from local banks.
On a related point, the IMF called for greater judgement in the application of mark-to-market accounting rules during stressed periods, which “may avoid accelerating capital needs by reducing the pressure to value securities at low firesale prices.”
Government injections of capital at viable institutions could be justified in the current climate, the IMF said. However, to put in place the conditions for more competitive markets in future, the agency called for the “orderly resolution of non-viable institutions.”
See also: SEC to ease mark-to-market rules
Iosco says regulators should monitor and inspect rating agencies
BIS to modify Basel II rules
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say