
Obama ties executive pay caps to bail-out funds
President Barack Obama on Wednesday unveiled a compensation cap of $500,000 for top executives at firms receiving "exceptional assistance" from the US government.
The compensation packages received by high-level executives, irrespective of performance, have come under scrutiny over the past several months as continued writedowns and significant losses from subprime assets have sent the banking sector into a tailspin. Accompanied by Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner, Obama stated that Americans are upset with "executives being rewarded for failure".
The new guidelines do not apply to banks who have received funding via a "generally available capital access programme", such as the Capital Purchase Program, which have the same terms for all recipients in addition to limits on bail-out amounts and specified returns for taxpayers.
Banks that are subject to the new requirements are those that have received more funding than allowed under these standard programmes, and which have specific negotiated agreements with the Treasury on repayment terms - for example, American International Group (AIG), Citigroup and Bank of America.
If executives at banks that have received exceptional assistance are compensated above the $500,000 limit, payment will be in the form of stock that is not redeemable until taxpayers have been reimbursed for their assistance, according to the new plan.
Under the new guidelines, the top 25 executives at firms receiving exceptional assistance will be required to pay back bonuses and incentive compensation if the company has misstated its financials. Previously, this clawback provision had been limited to the top five senior executives.
The plan also strengthened the ban on "golden parachutes" for senior executives and called for senior executive compensation plans be included in shareholder resolutions.
In September, the US government cobbled together a rescue package for AIG that provided a $85 billion bridge loan in exchange for taking a 79.9% stake in the troubled insurer. The government also agreed to borrow up to $37.8 billion of its investment-grade fixed-income securities in return for cash collateral.
Citigroup has received $20 billion in Troubled Assets Relief Program funds in addition to $25 billion from the CPP, while Bank of America received a $20 billion capital injection and guarantees on $118 billion of debt in return for carrying through its acquisition of Merrill Lynch.
See also: Executive pay reviewed at Barclays, UBS and Goldman
Deutsche CEO and UBS chairman decline bonuses
Bankers' incentives blamed for crisis
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
SEC’s Peirce calls for rethink of international standards
Risk Live Boston: regulator rejects international calls for bank-like regulation of investors
Tariff turbulence piles pressure on banks’ VAR models
Backtesting breaches start to mount, but too early to tell if regulatory intervention needed
Trading desks want regulators to face down the NMRF monster
Rule-makers in Australia and the European Union are open to changes to the unpopular FRTB test
CFTC’s Doge-inspired drive to enforcement may fall short
Lawyers doubt guidance on rewards for self-reporting goes far enough
FRTB may bite harder for Europe’s CVA modellers
Farther reach of advanced approach and lighter load on total requirements mean limited takeaways from Canada and Japan’s implementation
Can Europe’s FRTB refurb bring banks back to Club IMA?
Softening the NMRF regime permanently might have the most impact, but the output floor still hurts
Japan, Basel III and the pitfalls of being on time
Capital floor phase-in delay may be least-worst option for JFSA as US and Europe waver
Gould stands by OCC decision to end exams for reputation risk
Comptroller nominee also blames SVB failure on poor supervision, not tailoring rule