EU presses ahead with tougher regulation of rating agencies
The European Parliament today voted in favour of a new regulation that will force credit rating agencies (CRAs) to comply with minimum standards of good practice and transparency.
The regulation was adopted with 569 votes in favour, 47 votes against and four abstentions. Members of the European Parliament noted that CRAs had failed to adapt to the risks posed by the credit markets and to detect the worsening of financial market conditions in due time.
Under the new rules, CRAs operating in the European Union will need to register with the Committee of European Securities Regulators, which will be responsible for their day-to-day supervision.
Registered CRAs will be required to ensure ratings are not affected by conflicts of interest and to remain vigilant on the quality of the rating methodology. They will not be allowed to rate financial instruments without sufficient prior information; they must disclose their models, methodologies and assumptions and produce an annual transparency report; and they will have to create an internal function to review the quality of their ratings.
"We expect the conduct of the CRAs to be significantly improved as a result of this regulation, with clear benefits to the integrity and stability of the financial markets," said EU internal market and services commissioner Charlie McCreevy.
The new laws will become legally binding by 2010 and will affect any CRA operating in the EU, including the European subsidiaries of Standard & Poor's and Moody's.
See also: Banks suffer from stricter ratings criteriaOnly users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Capital neutrality key to completing Basel III, says Quarles
Former Republican Fed vice-chair thinks Hill or Bowman could help revive stalled prudential rules
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk