EU presses ahead with tougher regulation of rating agencies
The European Parliament today voted in favour of a new regulation that will force credit rating agencies (CRAs) to comply with minimum standards of good practice and transparency.
The regulation was adopted with 569 votes in favour, 47 votes against and four abstentions. Members of the European Parliament noted that CRAs had failed to adapt to the risks posed by the credit markets and to detect the worsening of financial market conditions in due time.
Under the new rules, CRAs operating in the European Union will need to register with the Committee of European Securities Regulators, which will be responsible for their day-to-day supervision.
Registered CRAs will be required to ensure ratings are not affected by conflicts of interest and to remain vigilant on the quality of the rating methodology. They will not be allowed to rate financial instruments without sufficient prior information; they must disclose their models, methodologies and assumptions and produce an annual transparency report; and they will have to create an internal function to review the quality of their ratings.
"We expect the conduct of the CRAs to be significantly improved as a result of this regulation, with clear benefits to the integrity and stability of the financial markets," said EU internal market and services commissioner Charlie McCreevy.
The new laws will become legally binding by 2010 and will affect any CRA operating in the EU, including the European subsidiaries of Standard & Poor's and Moody's.
See also: Banks suffer from stricter ratings criteriaOnly users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU banks hedge net interest income to pass new IRRBB test
Would-be outliers look to cut sensitivity of cashflows to rate moves, but at what cost?
Banks cry foul over shock decision from Basel Committee
Asset and liability management professionals question severity of criteria in revised IRRBB tests
Fresh EU push for single securities supervisor to compete with US
But MEP expresses ‘concern’ EU nations will stall revival of capital markets union
Discord deepens over fund-linked trades in FRTB
More banks use punitive approach to capital treatment under new trading book regime, irking regulators
AI, quantum computing and tokenisation set to transform finance – Menon
But significant barriers remain preventing the technologies from unlocking their full potential
Could the SEC revive the private fund adviser rule?
Industry experts deem a second life for the reviled rule unlikely
Vendors lack silver bullet for FRTB’s fund-linked issue
EU and UK legislators tried to ease capital charge by leaning on vendors, but problems persist
Does Basel’s internal loss multiplier add up?
As US agencies mull capital reforms, one regulator questions past losses as an indicator of future op risk