Agencies aim to unite US with Basel liquidity risk standards
US regulatory authorities yesterday released proposed guidance on contingent funding and liquidity risk in a bid to bring US financial institutions into alignment with international liquidity standards.
In a consultation paper released jointly by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of Thrift Supervision and the National Credit Union Administration, the US agencies re-emphasised "the importance of cashflow projections, diversified funding sources and a well-developed contingency funding plan" as primary tools for measuring and managing liquidity risk.
Formally titled Interagency guidance on funding and liquidity management, the consultation brings US principles into line with the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's recently released Principles for sound liquidity risk management and supervision.
Although the new document mainly covers old ground, it also provides more detail on some proposals - the active management of intraday liquidity and collateral, the maintenance of adequate levels of highly liquid marketable securities free of legal or regulatory impairments that can be used to meet liquidity needs in stressful situations, and the establishment of comprehensive contingency funding plans.
Supervisors will then "assess these critical elements in their reviews of an institution's liquidity risk management process in relation to its size, complexity and scope of operations".
Institutions will also be required to stress test regularly for a variety of firm-specific and market-wide events across multiple time horizons to identify sources of liquidity strain, and should be able to calculate all of their collateral positions on an intraday and overnight basis.
While many of the statutes are similar to existing US liquidity risk mandates, the guidance seeks to better marry current funding measures with those thrashed out by the Basel Committee in response to the lessons of the financial crisis.
When finalised, the guidance will apply to all US domestic financial institutions, including banks, thrifts and credit unions. Comments must be submitted to firms' respective regulators within 60 days.
See also: US regulatory reforms will target the big players
Risk Europe: Regulators must address structural liquidity mismatches
Reporting riddle
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact