Japan's banks under pressure as Nikkei hits fresh 20-year lows
Japan’s Nikkei 225 stock index fell to fresh 20-year lows today, sparking further concerns that the capital adequacy ratios of the country’s banks may come under acute pressure in the approach to the March fiscal year-end.
This has come at a time when banks are under pressure from Japan’s regulator, the Financial Services Agency, to accelerate the disposal of non-performing loans (reported at ¥40.1 trillion as of September 2002), which has already depleted Tier One capital levels. With the equity market continuing to fall, there has been growing concern that capital ratios of the major banks could potentially fall below the 8% minimum recommended by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
“If the equity market falls further, there could be a situation under which [the major banks] find it very difficult to meet the BIS regulatory capital ratio,” said Mutsuo Suzuki, senior vice-president of the ratings group at Moody’s Investment Service in Tokyo.
In January, Mizuho Holdings forecast that its losses would reach ¥2 trillion at the end of March, following a sharp increase in loan-loss provisions over the year. As a result, it reported that its capital adequacy ratio would fall to around 9% from 10.42% in September 2002. Analysts reckon a further fall in the Nikkei, increasing the bank’s unrealised losses even further, could put Mizuho’s capital ratio under critical pressure.
The major banks have recently been scrambling to bolster capital reserves ahead of the fiscal year-end. Mizuho, for example, is in the process of raising ¥1 trillion through the issuance of preference shares, while Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) announced in January that US investment bank Goldman Sachs will inject ¥150.3 billion of capital into the Japanese bank in exchange for convertible preference shares which, if converted, would give it a 7% stake in SMBC.
The Japanese government has stated it will consider converting the preference shares it holds as a result of the 1998 and 1999 bank capital injections into common stock – effectively a nationalisation – if there is a ‘serious deterioration’ in the banks’ financial performance, thought by some to mean a drop in capital ratios below 8%.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement
The wisdom of Oz? Why Australia is phasing out AT1s
Analysts think Australian banks will transition smoothly, but other countries unlikely to follow
EU trade repository matching disrupted by Emir overhaul
Some say problem affecting derivatives reporting has been resolved, but others find it persists
Barclays and HSBC opt for FRTB internal models
However, UK pair unlikely to chase approval in time for Basel III go-live in January 2026
Foreign banks want level playing field in US Basel III redraft
IHCs say capital charges for op risk and inter-affiliate trades out of line with US-based peers
CFTC’s Mersinger wants new rules for vertical silos
Republican commissioner shares Democrats’ concerns about combined FCMs and clearing houses
Adapting FRTB strategies across Apac markets
As Apac banks face FRTB deadlines, MSCI explores the insights from early adopters that can help them align with requirements