BoA wins $17.85m weather derivatives lawsuit
Diamond State Insurance, a unit of Cayman Islands-domiciled United National Group (UNG), has agreed to pay Bank of America (BoA) $17.85 million to settle its claims over a series of weather derivatives policies written through the now defunct Customized Worldwide Weather Insurance Agency (CWWIA).
The underlying derivatives contracts covered Enron and other energy traders, including North Carolina-based Duke, against losses resulting from unexpectedly warm weather. Platinum and an affiliate wrote the contracts and secured their obligations with letters of credit from BoA. They also ceded portions of the risks to Diamond State and other reinsurers, including Chubb.
But Diamond State denied liability under its reinsurance contracts after the energy traders suffered losses, instead alleging that CWWIA principal Harold Mollin fraudulently bound the coverage and then concealed details of the transactions from Diamond State. The insurer filed its own suit against Mollin, alleging that he fled with the premiums of the derivatives contracts. Mollin is believed to be in hiding in Thailand.
Diamond State is, however, trying to recoup its payment to BoA in an arbitration against Bermuda-based Partner Reinsurance. In a statement issued last week, UNG said it has “activated a pending arbitration against Partner Reinsurance Company Ltd and Partner Reinsurance Company of the US, seeking recovery under a reinsurance agreement covering business produced by Worldwide Weather Insurance Agency on a 100% basis with regard to the type of risk involved.”
In addition, Diamond State is seeking indemnification and contribution from Partner Reinsurance Company of the US because of its role in the appointment of Mollin and CWWIA.
One London-based weather trader, speaking on condition of anonymity, told RiskNews' sister publication Energy Risk that Mollin fled with anywhere between $10 million and $20 million, following the alleged fraud, adding that other CWWIA employees were not aware of Mollin’s alleged fraud at the time.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Stuck in the middle with EU: dealers clash over FRTB timing
Largest banks want Commission to delay implementation, but it’s not the legislator’s only option
Treasury clearing timeline ‘too aggressive’ says BofA rates head
Sifma gears up for extension talks with incoming SEC and Treasury officials
Rostin Behnam’s unfinished business
Next CFTC chair must finish the work Behnam started on crypto regulation and conflicts of interest
European Commission in ‘listening mode’ on potential FRTB changes
Delay or relief measures on the table after UK postpones start of Basel III to 2027
Australian FRTB projects slow down amid scheduling uncertainty
Market risk experts think Apra might soften NMRF regime to spur internal model adoption
EBA to address double-counting caused by new capital floor
Existing EU capital add-ons for model risk would duplicate new Basel floor on internal models
The Emir error reports that cost banks millions
Dealers lambast onerous EU requirement to notify clients of all errors and omissions
Basel stops short on wrong-way risk
New guidelines a step in right direction, but experts warn they won’t prevent another Archegos