Isda publishes new master agreement
Industry trade body the International Swaps and Derivatives Association has produced a new ‘master agreement’, a legal contract designed to standardise over-the-counter derivatives deals. It is the first time the document has been revised since 1992
The calculation of losses in the event of a counterparty defaulting is among the changes. The old document gave dealers two methods by which they could calculate their loss – one based on attaining market quotes to work out the value of the contract, the other based on the dealer simply guessing the expected loss.
Isda said the new, single method, which is called 'close-out amount', reflects the increase in volume and complexity of transactions during the past decade. Kimberley Summe, general counsel with Isda in New York, said the new rule still gives dealers “flexibility” in the way they calculate the loss. “But it is combined with objectivity in what is considered to be commercially reasonable data,” Summe said.
Isda also removed 'grace periods' associated with default from three days to one day. The grace period gives a defaulting party time to remedy its failure before a deal is finally closed. And the association included a 'set-off provision' in the new agreement, which lets the non-defaulter explore the possibility of finding other assets, such as a deposit account, that could be attached and set-off against the amount the defaulting party owes.
Meanwhile, the 2002 standard includes a 'force majuere termination event' clause, which lets parties terminate transactions affected by certain events beyond their control, such as natural or man-made disasters.
Robert Pickel, Isda chief executive, said the new master agreement represents a milestone in the association's efforts to reduce risk and promote practices conducive to the efficient conduct of the derivatives business. “It also strengthens the ability of market participants to more effectively manage risk amid the continuing growth and development of the derivatives industry,” added Pickel.
Isda said the 2002 master agreement is the product of two years of work that included hundreds of individuals representing companies from all market segments and regions.
Isda also released new equity derivatives guidelines, with coverage of various barrier options and forwards, and provisions relating to the pricing of products in the event of a disruption to trading activity. It intends to publish new credit derivatives guidelines in the coming weeks.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement
The wisdom of Oz? Why Australia is phasing out AT1s
Analysts think Australian banks will transition smoothly, but other countries unlikely to follow
EU trade repository matching disrupted by Emir overhaul
Some say problem affecting derivatives reporting has been resolved, but others find it persists
Barclays and HSBC opt for FRTB internal models
However, UK pair unlikely to chase approval in time for Basel III go-live in January 2026
Foreign banks want level playing field in US Basel III redraft
IHCs say capital charges for op risk and inter-affiliate trades out of line with US-based peers
CFTC’s Mersinger wants new rules for vertical silos
Republican commissioner shares Democrats’ concerns about combined FCMs and clearing houses