![Risk.net](https://www.risk.net/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
New regulation proposed for OTC energy derivatives
A bill was introduced in the US Senate yesterday that seeks to expand regulatory oversight of the over-the-counter energy commodity derivatives market. Bill sponsor Senator Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat from California, wants the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to provide greater transparency for energy commodity derivatives transactions on multilateral markets and electronic trading platforms.
Bill co-sponsors Senator Maria Cantwell, Democrat from Washington, and Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat from Oregon, along with Feinstein, represent western US states that were plagued in 2000 and 2001 by soaring energy prices.
Some have charged that the high prices were due to market manipulation by energy marketing firms such as Enron. As a possible example of such manipulation, Feinstein said that on December 12, 2000, the spot price of natural gas in Southern California was $59 but only $10 in neighbouring San Juan and New Mexico. She claimed the cost of transporting natural gas between the two states at the time was only $1. “So there was $48 unaccounted for that undoubtedly found its way into someone’s pocket,” said Feinstein.
With the proposed new legislation, Feinstein added, the federal government would have new powers to “step in and do their jobs when markets have gone awry”.
In addition to expanding regulatory oversight of energy commodity derivatives, the bill would also require online trading forums to maintain sufficient capital to support their trading operations and to maintain open books and records for inspection by Federal authorities.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU banks hedge net interest income to pass new IRRBB test
Would-be outliers look to cut sensitivity of cashflows to rate moves, but at what cost?
Banks cry foul over shock decision from Basel Committee
Asset and liability management professionals question severity of criteria in revised IRRBB tests
Fresh EU push for single securities supervisor to compete with US
But MEP expresses ‘concern’ EU nations will stall revival of capital markets union
Discord deepens over fund-linked trades in FRTB
More banks use punitive approach to capital treatment under new trading book regime, irking regulators
AI, quantum computing and tokenisation set to transform finance – Menon
But significant barriers remain preventing the technologies from unlocking their full potential
Could the SEC revive the private fund adviser rule?
Industry experts deem a second life for the reviled rule unlikely
Vendors lack silver bullet for FRTB’s fund-linked issue
EU and UK legislators tried to ease capital charge by leaning on vendors, but problems persist
Does Basel’s internal loss multiplier add up?
As US agencies mull capital reforms, one regulator questions past losses as an indicator of future op risk