Nationalisation required for Japanese bank recovery, says Fitch
A partial nationalisation of Japan’s ailing banks may be the only way to resolve the country’s economic woes, with recent efforts by individual institutions to restructure their balance sheets unlikely to lead to an autonomous recovery in the banking sector, according to a report by ratings agency Fitch Ratings.
In January, Mizuho said it expected to post a net loss of around ¥2 trillion in the year to March – making it the largest loss in Japanese corporate history - after drastically increasing the level of bad debt it has written off over the year. The bank added that it expected to raise ¥1 trillion, probably through the issuance of preferred shares, to bolster its capital. Meanwhile, US investment banks Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch said they would invest in SMFG and UFJ respectively, as the Japanese institutions look for new ways to shore up capital reserves ahead of the fiscal year end.
But with special inspections by the country’s regulator, the Financial Services Agency (FSA), expected in the next few months, banks could be forced to raise their loan loss provisions further. The FSA plans to use a stricter discount cashflow methodology, which assesses a borrower’s ability to generate profits when categorising loan quality. The FSA may also restrict the use of deferred tax credits – essentially tax refunds on the cost of writing off bad loans - widely used by banks to shore up capital levels. This means that banks may still require substantial injections of additional capital, Fitch said.
“Somewhat ironically, the most likely event that would raise [banks’] long-term debt and individual ratings would be full-fledged nationalisation,” said the report. The FSA is currently setting guidelines for the conversion of government-owned preference shares into ordinary shares – a move that would make the government the major shareholder in the big banks. “On the other hand, the banks are making every effort to avoid this alternative,” the report added.
Fitch last week downgraded the long-term ratings of Mizuho, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation and UFJ to BBB+ from A-, maintaining a negative outlook on all three banks.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement
The wisdom of Oz? Why Australia is phasing out AT1s
Analysts think Australian banks will transition smoothly, but other countries unlikely to follow
EU trade repository matching disrupted by Emir overhaul
Some say problem affecting derivatives reporting has been resolved, but others find it persists
Barclays and HSBC opt for FRTB internal models
However, UK pair unlikely to chase approval in time for Basel III go-live in January 2026
Foreign banks want level playing field in US Basel III redraft
IHCs say capital charges for op risk and inter-affiliate trades out of line with US-based peers
CFTC’s Mersinger wants new rules for vertical silos
Republican commissioner shares Democrats’ concerns about combined FCMs and clearing houses
Adapting FRTB strategies across Apac markets
As Apac banks face FRTB deadlines, MSCI explores the insights from early adopters that can help them align with requirements