OTS chief calls for federal mortgage regulation
The US requires strong and consistent mortgage regulation, according to OTS director John Reich
WASHINGTON, DC – The US mortgage industry needs stronger federal regulation, according to director of the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) John Reich, speaking at the centenary convention of the New Jersey League of Community Bankers.
Reich said the current US housing crisis provides a lesson that uneven mortgage regulation at state level is a weakness to the economy, while banks and other financial institutions face tougher and more uniform federal standards.
“We must establish a level playing field with the same rules for all competitors in the home mortgage sector, so standards do not fall to the lowest common denominator,” said Reich.
The director underlined that federal oversight of the entities that fund the mortgage process is crucial to effective regulation, adding that because of its nationwide mortgage lending expertise, the OTS is best qualified to fill the federal role
Reich said: “Establishing a partnership between the states and a federal regulator to set and enforce minimum mortgage funding standards would ensure accountability, consistency and transparency throughout the mortgage lending process.”
In a separate speech on the necessity of a responsible subprime lending culture, Reich said: “Homeownership remains the bedrock of strong communities, and responsible subprime lending helps more Americans become homeowners. It is important that as we strive to prevent the abuses of predatory lending, we do not close the doors of opportunity to credit-worthy subprime borrowers and deprive them of the chance to pursue the American dream of homeownership.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities