UK rejects Italian calls for single EU regulator
Alistair Darling categorically rejects the idea of a single financial regulator for Europe
BRUSSELS – The UK chancellor, Alistair Darling, rejected calls for pan-European regulation of financial markets at a meeting of EU finance ministers in Brussels on Tuesday.
However, Darling maintained his support for minor reforms of the system, which enables national supervisors to co-operate on cross-border issues while maintaining autonomy and flexibility at home.
Italian chancellor Tomasso Padoa-Schioppa called for a more centralised approach to financial markets regulation, and for a new regime that would see Brussels set binding rules on EU member states.
Ministers at the Ecofin summit discussed the recent review of the Lamfalussy system, while European commissioner for internal markets and services Charlie McCreevy’s speech highlighted the need for greater co-ordination between national regulators to monitor the financial markets in the wake of the subprime crisis.
Not for the first time, McCreevy suggested the idea of a pan-European regulator, formed by Europe's financial regulators joining together to create a college with a rotating chairman – similar in substance to the supervisory system in place at NYSE Euronext. The chairmanship of the Euronext Regulatory College rotates from country to country in order to improve co-ordination and facilitate the decision making process. Such a body would help to remove the barriers to cross-border business and help provide more unity in financial regulation, according to McCreevy.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules