Merrill Lynch chief executive forced out over bonus row
New York - The hangover of Bank of America's (BoA) shotgun wedding to Merrill Lynch organised in September 2008 continues. John Thain, the chief executive officer of Merrill Lynch until its formal takeover by BoA on January 1, was sacked as a result of bad publicity surrounding a decision to pay Merrill executives $4 billion in employee bonuses one month early, at the end of December.
Thain, who maintains BoA was fully aware of the decision and involved in discussions, also received additional negative publicity thanks to the leaking of the $1 million cost of the refurbishment of his Merrill Lynch office. According to press reports, BoA says it was informed of the decision to give bonuses early, but was not party to it.
The bonus news came on the heels of BoA's announcement of a $15.3 billion loss related to its acquisition of Merrill Lynch. Although BoA had announced profits of $4.01 billion for 2008, the Merrill Lynch loss had already forced it to apply for debt protection from the US Treasury.
BoA's 2008 results include its purchase of Countrywide Financial on July 1 2008, but not the Merrill deal, which took place officially on January 1, 2009.
The Treasury and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has offered to guarantee $118 billion of debt held by Bank of America in loans, securities backed by residential and commercial real estate loans and other assets, marked to current market value. The Treasury is also investing a further $20 billion directly through its Troubled Asset Relief Program in exchange for preferred stock, offered with an 8% dividend.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Capital neutrality key to completing Basel III, says Quarles
Former Republican Fed vice-chair thinks Hill or Bowman could help revive stalled prudential rules
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk