Westpac acts over A$11 million funds transfer error
SYDNEY - Westpac, the Australian bank, has begun legal proceedings against former customer Victor Ollis, an estate agent from New South Wales, over a dispute concerning A$11 million ($8.9m) that was mistakenly transferred into his account over a two-year period.
Ollis had an automatic sweeper facility with Westpac, which routinely topped up his business account using money from his personal account. Even though Ollis's personal account became overdrawn, the bank continued to transfer money to his business account from its own funds. Ollis admits to writing cheques with money found in his account, but he denies fraud. Westpac honoured cheques totalling A$11million between June and December 2005 before discovering the mistake in January 2006.
The bank is also suing Ollis's partner, Gail Shields, who received A$4.8million in funds transferred into her account from his.
Shields is defending the case, saying she believed the money legitimately belonged to her partner. Both Ollis and Shields have had their assets frozen by the NSW Crime Commission.
The case continues.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement