Westpac acts over A$11 million funds transfer error
SYDNEY - Westpac, the Australian bank, has begun legal proceedings against former customer Victor Ollis, an estate agent from New South Wales, over a dispute concerning A$11 million ($8.9m) that was mistakenly transferred into his account over a two-year period.
Ollis had an automatic sweeper facility with Westpac, which routinely topped up his business account using money from his personal account. Even though Ollis's personal account became overdrawn, the bank continued to transfer money to his business account from its own funds. Ollis admits to writing cheques with money found in his account, but he denies fraud. Westpac honoured cheques totalling A$11million between June and December 2005 before discovering the mistake in January 2006.
The bank is also suing Ollis's partner, Gail Shields, who received A$4.8million in funds transferred into her account from his.
Shields is defending the case, saying she believed the money legitimately belonged to her partner. Both Ollis and Shields have had their assets frozen by the NSW Crime Commission.
The case continues.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules