UBS in Gathering Storm of Subprime Lawsuits
LONDON, NEW YORK AND CONNECTICUT - Swiss bank UBS has filed a lawsuit in London in retaliation for one in New York by HSH Nordbank over losses from soured subprime investments. Meanwhile, hedge fund Pursuit Partners is suing UBS over the mis-selling of $50 million of a subprime-laden collateralised debt obligation (CDO) soon afterward downgraded to junk.
German bank HSH previously launched a $275 million lawsuit for mis-selling more risky CDOs subsequently written down. A UBS spokesman says the bank had executed its contractual obligations and was comfortable with its legal position. The Swiss bank has suffered heavily from the subprime crisis - writing down $10 billion in losses and forced to seek $12 billion from Asian donors to keep afloat.
HSH has accused it of breaking its contract, fraudulent acts and using the HSH's funds for investment solely for UBS' benefit. Pursuit has similarly claimed UBS was guilty of "fraudulent concealment" of material information. Pursuit says UBS was in communication with Moody's about its CDO ratings but continued to market them between last July and October despite knowing rating changes were imminent.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement