UK FSA fines firm £560,000 for breaches
LONDON – The UK's Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined W Deb MVL (WDM) £560,000 for widespread failings in its systems and controls, which resulted in poor accounting systems and inadequate client money protection. The failings, according to the FSA, occurred over a four and a half year period from December 2001 to May 2005.
"The implementation and maintenance of appropriate systems and controls is essential to maintaining market and consumer confidence in the financial system and individual firms," says Margaret Cole, head of enforcement at the regulator. "A firm that fails to meet these basic requirements can pose significant risks to its clients and ultimately its own financial health."
Overall, the FSA found that WDM had breached four of the FSA Principles for Business as well as relevant FSA rules on client money. The primary effect of these failures was that WDM was unable to monitor its own financial position or to comply with its financial reporting requirements adequately, said the FSA in a statement. This resulted in the firm making total provisions of £66.3 million in its accounts for 2004 and 2005 in respect of assets viewed as irrecoverable. These provisions in turn led to concerns about the firm's solvency and to its former parent company, ING, waiving loans totalling £58 million to ensure it remained adequately capitalised.
Cole adds: "In determining the level of penalty, the FSA has taken into account the fact that WDM and ING identified potential regulatory issues at the firm in 2005 and acted properly and responsibly in reporting these to the FSA. The firm, ING and, since it acquired the firm, Evolution Group plc, have been open and co-operative with the FSA in bringing this investigation to a prompt conclusion."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Capital neutrality key to completing Basel III, says Quarles
Former Republican Fed vice-chair thinks Hill or Bowman could help revive stalled prudential rules
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk