Westgate president charged with $150m investment fraud
Hedge fund boss will face $150 million fraud allegations in a New York court
NEW YORK - James Nicholson, president of Westgate Capital Management, is facing charges over an alleged $150 million fraud at his investment management firm. The alleged fraud has all the hallmarks of a Ponzi scheme and led to investigators freezing Westgate's and Nicholson's assets last month.
He faces four felony charges, including securities fraud and investment adviser fraud, according to a statement by Lev Dassin, acting US attorney for the Southern District of New York.
The allegations date back to 2004 and allege Nicholson made inflated claims to investors of the value of assets under his management, claiming to manage between $600 million and $900 million. Prosecutors said $5 million in cheques made out to the fund's investors bounced in December 2008.
The fund's marketing brochures are also alleged to have disclosed "uniformly positive" returns each month between October 1999 and August 2008 except for September 2001 - echoing the Ponzi scheme fraud allegations made against Texan billionaire Sir Allen Stanford and those already proven against imprisoned fund manager Bernard Madoff.
Prosecutors allege Nicholson's fund performance was much lower during those months and also accuse him of withdrawing $400,000 from a number of Westgate accounts in 50 transactions made at small increments designed to evade the radar of reporting requirements.
Investigators appointed a receiver for Westgate last month in addition to freezing Nicholson's assets and those under management by Westgate.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision