EC U-turn on Sepa direct debits
The EC and ECB have conceded to allow “transitional” fees for Sepa direct debits
BRUSSELS & FRANKFURT – The European Commission (EC) and European Central Bank (ECB) are calling on banks to accelerate plans for crossborder direct debit schemes, whether or not interchange fees are charged for the payments.
The EC’s move may be viewed as a reaction to the banking sector’s sluggish implementation of harmonised crossborder payments within the Single Euro Payments Area (Sepa), under the delayed Payment Services Directive (PSD).
The EC and ECB said in a September 4 joint statement that they have indicated to the European Payments Council (EPC) that they were prepared to support multilateral interchange charges, provided fees are “objectively justified and transitional”.
“A European solution has to be found by the banks which is also agreeable to the competition authorities,” said Gertrude Tumpel-Gugerell, Frankfurt-based ECB executive board member. “But Sepa direct debits have to be rolled out in a little more than one-year from now.”
“In this respect, the idea of maintaining at national level the same interchange fee for national legacy and Sepa schemes during a limited transitional phase should facilitate the rolling out of the Sepa direct debit scheme,” said Tumpel-Gugerell. “This would also ensure the necessary level playing-field in the national context for the Sepa direct debit scheme and the national legacy direct debit schemes.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact