Mizuho Securities loses $223m in trading error
TOKYO – Mizuho Securities, the Japanese broker, says a securities trading error will cost it $347 million. The broking arm of the Japanese bank (Mizuho) mistakenly sold $2.7 billion worth of stock in recruitment firm J-Com, on the Tokyo Stock Exchange.
J-Com had just completed a $14 million initial public offering on the Tokyo market for smaller companies.
J-Com's shares, which were listed at ¥610, 000, dropped immediately to ¥572, 000 shortly after listing when the order was received to sell around 610, 000 shares at ¥1 each, instead of ¥610, 000 per share. As a result, J-Com sold only 2, 800 shares on its debut at the exchange.
Mizuho tried to rectify the mistake by buying back the shares through proprietary trading, which allows a bank to use its own reserves as capital for trades.
At the end of December, Japan's Financial Services Agency said in a statement that Mizuho had failed to train its traders sufficiently well, and did not have senior management in place to oversee these operations. The firm must submit a plan to the regulator to improve its business processes, and it must also clarify who was responsible for the trading error and designate a crisis management team.
The regulator also ordered nearly 300 brokerage firms in Japan to examine their stock trading systems and internal controls, and report by January 20 on needed improvements.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness