FSA paper raises retail standards
The FSA has released its review of retail financial advice in the UK
According to some independent financial advisors the new requirements could lead to greater consolidation as smaller entities struggle to deliver new standards. Consumer group, the Financial Services Consumer Panel (FSCP), has also criticised the continued grey areas between advice and sales.
Remuneration for financial advisors will be reformed with the aim of minimising conflicts of interest by reducing existing reliance on commission-based advice. More emphasis will be placed on up-front client fees which the regulator believes will foster professional standards.
Money guidance services will be a particular focus, to ensure the consumer's debt repayment abilities are effectively judged, necessitating a more detailed approach to existing 'know your customer' requirements.
"The RDR gives the financial community the opportunity to engage with both the regulator and consumer," says Joanne Smith, managing director at retail consultancy the Consulting Consortium. "By improving perception of the industry we will not only increase consumer confidence but ensure there is a solid investment market on which to build."
The FSA says standards of independent advice will be raised to produce two distinguishable levels of service. A broader, more comprehensive approach to market analysis will ensure independence of advice. For consumers seeking only basic advice, a more guided sale category will be introduced requiring less overview.
Higher professional standards are expected for financial advisers. The regulator aims to improve the industry profile and better mitigate risk by increasing qualification standards (to QCA Level 4 standard).
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities