Fidelity National faces suit for negligence
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA - A lawsuit has been filed against Fidelity National Information Services (FIS), a large transaction processor and outsourcer to the financial services sector, and its subsidiary check verification firm, Certegy Check Services, concerning the alleged compromise of personal data.
The complaint, filed at the central district of California on behalf of 8.5 million customers, does not seek damages but accuses the defendants of negligence, invasion of privacy and breach of implied contract.
Both companies are charged with the failure to implement and maintain adequate security measures for protecting confidential financial information belonging to consumers.
They are also accused of failing to properly monitor and supervise the activities of employees entrusted with consumer data.
The breach in question, disclosed by FIS in July, involved a Certegy senior database administrator who illegally accessed and downloaded millions of consumer records and sold them to data brokers. Los Angeles-based resident Theodore Borreson first brought the case when he noticed an influx of direct marketing and promotional offers. The defendants are accused of failing to notify customers immediately of the breach.
Proving a direct link between data theft and identity theft or fraud is difficult and in the past has usually deterred victims from taking legal action against the firm in question.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement