Remorseful former Enron CFO receives reduced sentence
In late September, disgraced former Enron chief financial officer Andrew Fastow was sentenced to six years in prison for overseeing fraudulent off-balance-sheet dealings that brought down the company and made him millions.
But the judge in Houston, Texas, Ken Hoyt, did not hand down the maximum 10-year term on the grounds that Fastow had shown remorse and co-operated with government officials.
In 2004, Fastow had agreed to serve as long as 10 years in exchange for testifying against the former top executives of the energy company, which has now become synonymous with corporate accounting scandals and fraud.
Evidence provided by Fastow helped secure the convictions for conspiracy and fraud of Enron’s founder, Kenneth Lay, and the former chief executive Jeffrey Skilling. Hoyt described Fastow as having been "drunk on the wine of greed" but acknowledged that the former chief financial officer had demonstrated remorse by fully co-operating.
"These factors call for mercy," the judge said. Fastow has accused 10 leading investment banks of helping Enron falsify its accounts in return for lucrative advisory fees. The accusations are made in a 24-page legal declaration filed by Fastow in support of a class action lawsuit against the banks brought on behalf of Enron’s shareholders.
In his statement, Fastow said he viewed the banks as well-paid "problem-solvers" who knowingly helped Enron create fictitious financial structures that made the company appear far more profitable than it really was.
Attorneys for Enron shareholders, led by Lerach Coughlin, have already won $8 billion in settlements from a group of banks that includes Citigroup, Bank of America and JP Morgan.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Capital neutrality key to completing Basel III, says Quarles
Former Republican Fed vice-chair thinks Hill or Bowman could help revive stalled prudential rules
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk