Bear bankers face charges over hedge fund losses
Two ex-Bear Stearns asset managers are in hot water over failed hedge funds
NEW YORK – Two former Bear Stearns bankers could face criminal charges over the collapse of two hedge funds that cost the failed bank $6 billion (£3 billion) in July 2007.
Ralf Cioffi and Matthew Tannin could be accused of misleading investors before the two funds folded due to US subprime mortgage debts. The two men could be the first high-profile bankers to stand trial in relation to the subprime crisis.
Investigators from the Department of Justice (DoJ) are reportedly interviewing key witnesses and gathering information related to the case. After the evidence is gathered, the US Attorney for New York’s eastern district, Benton Campbell, will assess if securities laws have been broken and whether to charge the men.
Tannin ran the bank’s asset management while Cioffi was responsible for the funds in question – the High Grade Strategy and Enhanced High Grade fund. After injecting $1.6 billion of capital into the funds in June 2007, the bank abandoned hope for their revival.
Both men have reportedly told friends that they had not realised the true state of the investments within the funds, but were instead coping with the general downturn in debt markets. Cioffi moved $2 million of his own money from one of the funds in March 2007.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact