Banco Delta Asia comes clean over purchase of gold from North Korea
Banco Delta Asia, labelled by the US Treasury as a "primary money laundering concern", has admitted that it purchased a large amount of gold from North Korea, one of its biggest exports.
Through its US lawyers Heller Ehrman, Delta Asia stated that it bought 9.2 tonnes of gold from North Korea in the three years to September 2005, selling it through Delta Asia Credit, its Hong Kong unit, and taking commission of $1.50 an ounce. The article said this raised $120 million for Pyongyang.
Delta Asia's Treasury filing also acknowledged that the bank had provided services to North Korea's Tanchon Commercial Bank, which had been blacklisted three months before by the US, deeming it the main North Korean financial agent for sales of conventional arms, ballistic missiles and related goods.
Delta Asia blames outdated technology for the oversight and for its inability to generate reports on unusual deposits and possible shortcomings in screening retail cash deposits for counterfeit currency. Ernst & Young, which reviewed the bank's operations last year, found that the bank paid insufficient attention to maintaining its own books and had identified a North Korea-related account that bank staff had missed during the original asset freeze.
Delta Asia's statement is an attempt to get the US Treasury to lift its labelling as a primary money laundering concern, which had caused other banks to break off commercial ties with Delta Asia, and had panicked customers.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Capital neutrality key to completing Basel III, says Quarles
Former Republican Fed vice-chair thinks Hill or Bowman could help revive stalled prudential rules
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk