FSA FINES NORWICH UNION LIFE £1.26M
LONDON - The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined Norwich Union Life £1.26 million for exposing its customers' confidential information to fraud.
Several external fraud incidents took place, due to poor systems and controls at the firm, which resulted in a number of customers' names and dates of birth becoming publicly available. The fraudsters gained further confidential account access and information by impersonating customers in calls to the firm's call centres.
In all, 74 customers' policies - totalling £3.3 million - were surrendered to identity theft scams during 2006. The FSA said Norwich Union Life had failed its customers by not keeping their information secure and not properly assessing its fraud risk.
The company's own compliance department reported to superiors on the exposure after it had taken place, but nothing was at first done to rectify the problem. Norwich Union Life co-operated with the FSA investigation, conducting a review of information security processes and reinstating the policies in full.
Margaret Cole, FSA enforcement director, says: "This fine is a clear message that the FSA takes information security seriously and requires that firms do so too."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising