FSA FINES NORWICH UNION LIFE £1.26M
LONDON - The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined Norwich Union Life £1.26 million for exposing its customers' confidential information to fraud.
Several external fraud incidents took place, due to poor systems and controls at the firm, which resulted in a number of customers' names and dates of birth becoming publicly available. The fraudsters gained further confidential account access and information by impersonating customers in calls to the firm's call centres.
In all, 74 customers' policies - totalling £3.3 million - were surrendered to identity theft scams during 2006. The FSA said Norwich Union Life had failed its customers by not keeping their information secure and not properly assessing its fraud risk.
The company's own compliance department reported to superiors on the exposure after it had taken place, but nothing was at first done to rectify the problem. Norwich Union Life co-operated with the FSA investigation, conducting a review of information security processes and reinstating the policies in full.
Margaret Cole, FSA enforcement director, says: "This fine is a clear message that the FSA takes information security seriously and requires that firms do so too."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement