Anger as Bank of America withholds bonuses after $4 billion Merrill payout
Merrill Lynch under investigation by New York attorney general over its $4 billion bonus payout
NEW YORK & CHARLOTTE, NC - News that Bank of America (BofA) will withhold bonus payments of more than $50,000 to investment bank employees has inflamed the tension between BofA staff and those of Merrill Lynch, who were paid $4 billion in early bonuses, only days before BofA completed its purchase of Merrill Lynch on January 1.
Bank of America employees that were to receive bonuses of more than $50,000 will not get a year-end bonus for 2008, but will receive the deferred payments in one-third increments in 2010, 2011 and 2012, according to a report in the Financial Times.
New York attorney-general Andrew Cuomo is already investigating Merrill Lynch chief executive John Thain's decision to accelerate the payment of $4 billion in bonuses before the BofA takeover, the deal for which was completed in principle in September 2008. Merrill then passed the buck for $15.8 billion in 2008 losses over to BofA, which has since been forced to seek a $20 billion US government recapitalisation as well as Treasury guarantees for $118 billion in bad debts.
Part of that bailout package restricts BofA from paying out bonuses to its employees - remuneration restrictions from which Merrill was immune during its final days of independence. Cuomo already issued a subpoena on January 27 and is keen to grill Thain over the bank's rushed $4 billion payout.
Bank of America boss Ken Lewis described the Merrill takeover as "the deal of a lifetime" when initially struck last September. It is understood Lewis paid close to $20 billion to acquire Merrill Lynch - once Wall Street's largest brokerage.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Trump 2.0 bank supervision: simpler but no soft touch?
Republican FDIC vice-chair Travis Hill wants more focus on financial risk instead of process
Iosco mimics industry codes to tackle pre-hedging dilemma
Advocates breathe sigh of relief, but Iosco release carries suggested restrictions
Ice’s AFX swoop shines spotlight on Ameribor prospects
CEO John Shay steps down after exchange group buys firm for mortgage and index synergies
Barr’s Fed exit likely to delay, but not destroy, Basel III
Market risk, op risk and leverage ratio all in the sights of Barr’s potential successors
FCMs call for more oversight of self-clearing CCP members
Clearing firms worry that PTFs and market-makers joining CCPs en masse will increase systemic risk
Complex EU active account reporting could drive trades out of UK
Draft Emir rules might not force large volumes to move to EU, but will make compliance difficult
Capital neutrality key to completing Basel III, says Quarles
Former Republican Fed vice-chair thinks Hill or Bowman could help revive stalled prudential rules
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices