FSA fines mortgage lender
Home and County Mortgages Limited (HCML) has been fined £52,000 by the Financial Services Authority (FSA), for management failures and a lack of "skill, care and diligence".
The FSA found that one of HCML's advisers had inflated customer incomes on mortgage applications and that the company failed to deal with the matter.
The regulator stated that HCML failed to disclose the true cost of the single-premium payment protection insurance being recommended to its customers. In addition, the FSA found weaknesses in the company's sales processes, meaning customers were at risk from unsuitable advice.
Staff at HCML were found not to be following the company's complaints-handling process, nor dealing with all complaints on a consistent basis.
"HCML has been given a significant penalty for breaches of FSA principles, reflecting the seriousness of the misconduct and the risks posed to its customers arising from the management failures," said Jonathan Phelan, head of retail enforcement at the FSA. "We expect firms to have management controls in place to monitor their business effectively, and to deal effectively with misconduct by their staff, particularly where it has an impact on customers."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Capital neutrality key to completing Basel III, says Quarles
Former Republican Fed vice-chair thinks Hill or Bowman could help revive stalled prudential rules
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk