UBS expects subprime losses of $680 million in third quarter
LONDON - Swiss lender UBS has suffered its first quarterly loss in a decade, leading to a purge of senior management positions and job losses at lower levels. About 1,500 redundancies are expected by year-end.
The investment bank has reported it expects third-quarter losses of up to Sfr800 million, mainly due to investments tied to subprime assets.
Marcel Rohner, chief executive of UBS, says: "Our first quarterly loss in nine years is an unsatisfactory result, especially after such a strong first half. I have therefore taken decisive action to be as transparent as possible."
UBS's losses outstripped those of its rivals "because we are overweight in the US subprime market, with much higher volumes in a market that has for many years had low volatility," says Rohner.
Senior departures include chairman Huw Jenkins. Rohner now takes the wheel. Jenkins will serve as an adviser to Rohner, who has only been chief executive since Peter Wuffli left in July. Mark Suter, executive vice-chairman, replaces Clive Standish as CFO and Walter Stuerzinger, group chief risk officer, is the new chief operating officer, corporate centre.
UBS had already closed its hedge fund operation, Dillon Read Capital Management, after Sfr380 million in subprime losses. Its approach to write-downs has been equally ruthless. Rohner says it is comfortable with its "rigorous approach" and, while hoping for better results in Q4, has not ruled out further depreciation. It still holds $19 billion of subprime assets. Some 90% are triple-A rated, and 80% have a weighted average life of less than three years. Rohner welcomes the effect the Fed's 0.5% cut on interest rates might have on the market.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve