BAS fined $26m for false research reporting
NEW YORK – The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has settled an enforcement action against Bank of America Securities (BAS) for issuing fraudulent research and failing to safeguard forthcoming research reports concerning analyst upgrades and downgrades.
BAS will pay $26 million in disgorgement penalties and agree to a censure and a cease and desist order. The SEC found that BAS experienced a breakdown in internal controls to detect and prevent misuse of its research reports by the firm and its employees between January 1999 and December 2001.
Despite BAS sales and trading employees knowing of forthcoming research changes involving upgrades and downgrades, BAS failed to provide clear guidance regarding the handling of the research, and on at least two occasions traded before the research reports were issued. The SEC also concluded that BAS failed to address conflict of interest issues that compromised the independence and integrity of its analysts.
BAS will henceforth retain an independent consultant to conduct a review of the firm's internal controls and prevent the misuse of information regarding forthcoming research reports.
BAS neither confirmed nor denied the Commission's findings.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Capital neutrality key to completing Basel III, says Quarles
Former Republican Fed vice-chair thinks Hill or Bowman could help revive stalled prudential rules
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
