Jeffries & Co charged by SEC over illegal gifts and expenses
The US Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged registered broker-dealer Jeffries & Co and two of its executives – Scott Jones and Kevin Quinn – in connection with illegal gifts and entertainment expenses.
According to the SEC, Quinn, Jeffries' former senior vice-president and equity-sales trader, was hired in May 2002 to increase the firm's brokerage business with a family of mutual funds managed by an adviser with whom Quinn had an existing relationship.
Quinn's compensation package included a $1.5 million annual travel and entertainment budget, which was spent on travel, entertainment and lavish gifts for some of its most successful equity traders. The list of gifts included Broadway shows, private jets and in one case, payment for a trader's bachelor party.
Brokers are barred from compensating mutual fund traders for brokerage business under Section 17(e)(1) of the Investment Company Act, and under Section 17(a)(1) and Rule 17a-3 of the Exchange Act.
Walter G. Ricciardi, deputy director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement, said: "The traders' loyalty and allegiance are owed solely to investors, and such compensation may harm investors by impairing the traders' objective judgment. Here, Mr. Quinn lavished gifts and excessive entertainment on select equity traders to improperly sway the flow of brokerage business. Jeffries and Mr. Jones [the firm's director of equities] failed to properly supervise Mr. Quinn."
The firm, Jones and Quinn have agreed to the SEC's institution of settled enforcement proceedings, which involves substantial fines and a bar on Quinn's future employment in the financial industry. Jeffries was suspended for three months from acting in a supervisory capacity for any broker or dealer, and was ordered to pay a $5.5 million penalty to the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD).
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules